The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
Blog Article
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It is actually properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority in the parent department from the petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent is likewise directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of at some point during the registration of FIR which has not been explained through the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness in the alleged incidence and the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired for being the real brothers on the deceased but they didn't respond whatsoever into the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of instances that extra judicial confession of an accused is really a weak type of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred by the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution is also depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning existence of some light with the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners with each other with a motorcycle at four.
Normally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (including Those people in distinct violation of established case law) on the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, plus the case is not appealed, the decision will stand.
Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of legislation.
Power to levy tax and also to legislate on immovable property including tax on annual rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are on the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally sound, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really topic to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post permit here the case of your petitioners for promotion can be regarded, however, we're very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, topic to availability of vacancy subject into the approval of your competent authority. Read more
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
Generally, only an appeal accepted because of the court of previous resort will resolve this kind of differences and, For most reasons, these kinds of appeals are frequently not granted.
Please note, When you are seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Using keywords effectively is additionally important. Contemplate using synonyms and variations of your keywords to make sure you seize all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion from the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only finished In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded into the allegations therefore they were perfectly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Stacy, a tenant in a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not given her enough notice before raising her rent, citing a new state regulation that demands a minimum of ninety days’ notice. Martin argues that the new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.